Lindsay Clancy Trial Spotlights the Feminist War on the Truth

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Lindsay Clancy Trial Spotlights the Feminist War on the Truth

September 7, 2026 – Lindsay Clancy sent her husband, Patrick, to get a takeout order from a local restaurant. While he was gone, Lindsay took their three children — Callan, 8 months, Dawson, 3 years, and Cora, 5 years — to the basement, where she strangled each of them with exercise resistance bands.

Last month, Lindsay was brought to trial for the heinous murder of the three children.

In response, feminists began to circulate the claim that Lindsay was innocent of all wrong-doing, and that the real killer was Patrick. One TikTok poll asked, “Who do you think really killed Lindsay Clancy’s three children?” Unbelievably, among 130,000 respondents – mostly young women — 93% pointed to Patrick as the perpetrator.

An astonished Tracie Morrissey responded, “That’s an absolutely bananas statistic for a murder case in which the defendant admits she did it.” (1)

Although not a scientific survey, the 93% number highlights how far the feminist War on the Truth has progressed.

Feminists are even challenging basic notions of biology. During her 2022 Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Ketanji Brown Jackson was asked to define the word “woman.” Jackson declined to provide a definition because, in her words, “I’m not a biologist.” (2)

Globally, the United Nations now endorses transgender ideology by “promoting the full realization of the human rights and equality of all people, including women in all their diversity, and all people with diverse sexual orientations, gender identities, gender expressions and sex characteristics (SOGIESC).” (3)

Feminists often claim that their goal is to achieve “gender equality.” In reality, they ignore the many disadvantages experienced by men (4), and seek to impose policies that promote female advantage over men (5).

Feminist researchers are motivated by what is called “feminist scholarship.” In the words of Adrienne Barnett of the University of London, feminist scholarship insists that scientific objectivity is an “unattainable and indeed undesirable goal.” Barnett goes so far as to instruct feminist researchers to commit academic fraud: “We don’t go out and collect data; we create data.” (6)

A global example of feminist scholarship is apparent in the area of domestic violence. Incontrovertible evidence from studies around the world shows women are as likely as men to engage in partner abuse (7).

But feminists resort to a series of information-distortion techniques to maintain their control over the domestic violence narrative (8):

Suppress evidence — Conceal data showing female perpetration.
Avoid obtaining data inconsistent with the patriarchal dominance theory — Word questions in ways to not collect information on female-perpetrated violence.
Cite only studies that show male perpetration — Cite one-sided data from abuse shelters.
Conclude that results refute symmetry when they do not — Misinterpret findings to dishonestly claim they support male-only perpetration.
Create “evidence” by citation — Create bogus evidence by citing ideologically aligned studies.
Obstruct funding of research that might contradict patriarchal dominance theory.
Harass and threaten researchers who produce evidence that contradicts the feminist narrative.

Last week all 9 female members of the jury voted to absolve Lindsay Clancy of the crime by reason of insanity. But one jurist, a male, insisted on her guilt. So the judge was forced to declare a mistrial (9).

This disturbing outcome reveals the extent to which the feminist War on the Truth is undermining society’s quest for justice. As philosopher Thomas Paine once warned, “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”

The Domestic Abuse and Violence International Alliance – DAVIA — unites 235 member organizations from 44 countries in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, Latin America, and North America. DAVIA seeks to ensure that domestic violence and abuse policies are science-based, family-affirming, and gender-inclusive. https://endtodv.org/davia/ DAVIA welcomes contributions: https://endtodv.org/donate/

Links: