Feminists Exploit Lindsay Clancy Trial to Promote Warped Ideology

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Feminists Exploit Lindsay Clancy Trial to Promote Warped Ideology

September 14, 2026 – On January 24, 2023, Lindsay Clancy sent her husband, Patrick, out to get a carryout meal. She then took their three children — Cora (5 years), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months) — to the basement of their Massachusetts home and strangled them with exercise bands.

The gruesome killing unleashed a series of claims that would eventually embroil the country in a series of sharp controversies:

Ignore the Real Victims: During the trial, hundreds of pink-clad women lined the street outside the Plymouth County courthouse, declaring “She Needed Help,” “They failed her,” and “Believe.” The women did not express a scintilla of regret for the gruesome deaths of the three innocent children. The Feminist Death Cult returns to haunt us.
Postpartum Psychosis: In order to absolve Clancy of the criminal charges, Clancy’s lawyer claimed she suffered from “postpartum psychosis.” But that was not true. Her psychiatric nurse practitioner, Rebecca Jollotta, and psychiatrist, Jennifer Tufts, both testified that Clancy did not have psychosis. (1) Clancy was depressed, not psychotic.
Blame the Guy: As part of their belief in an all-powerful “patriarchy,” feminists reflexively blame men when things go wrong. Without a scrap of evidence, women circulated rumors that the real killer was Lindsay’s husband, Patrick. (2) Apparently Lindsay Clancy is not the only one suffering from a mental health problem.
Racism: After the jury failed to reach a consensus, juror Kellie Farina criticized the male holdout as someone who “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.” And juror Paula Devlin chided the man as “very arrogant.” But when it was later revealed that the dissenter was a Black man, the criticisms suddenly stopped. (3) Miraculous?
DEI Fantasies: The American criminal system was designed to have the prosecutor and defense attorney present the two sides of the story, allowing the truth emerge from the clash of perspectives. But juror Kellie Farina criticized the prosecutor for being “without a heart.” Why? Because he did not present a warm-fuzzy character witness who was a “woman and a mother of three children.” (4) Reality check: Criminal trials are not designed to fulfill persons’ DEI fantasies.
Copy-Cat Crime: As lawyers were preparing for Clancy’s trial in Plymouth, on April 24 Janette MacAusland of Wellesley, Massachusetts allegedly strangled her two children, Kai (7) and Ella (6). This past Thursday, her defense attorney requested that MacAusland’s case be dismissed. His justification? There wasn’t enough information to keep the 49-year-old woman behind bars. (5) Two more dead bodies — so what’s the big deal?
Ethics Complaint. On June 23, less than a month before the trial began, Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, was charged with professional misconduct in four prior cases. The counts accused Reddington of using money from one client’s trust account for another. (6) The timing of the ethics complaint may have been coincidental, but was consistent with whole tawdry affair of Lindsay Clancy.

Imagine a society in which the truth is constantly subject to personal whim — in which persons ignore the true victims of crime, make baseless claims about medical conditions, reflexively blame men, publicly shame jurors, and construct the criminal system as a venue to obtain psychological help.

In the words of Ayn Rand, “Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent.”

The Domestic Abuse and Violence International Alliance – DAVIA — unites 235 member organizations from 44 countries in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, Latin America, and North America. DAVIA seeks to ensure that domestic violence and abuse policies are science-based, family-affirming, and gender-inclusive. https://endtodv.org/davia/ DAVIA welcomes contributions: https://endtodv.org/donate/

Links: